Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: doc drennan Date: Aug 27, 2006 11:51am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: best aud

okay, i no this is a lame question but i am bored and it is sunday hands down best audience download;sound wise and jam wise

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: dscott Date: Aug 27, 2006 11:55am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: best aud

There is no consensus *best*, but there are some very good ones out there. Some recommendations that come to mind are 7/1/73, 3/9+10/81, and the fall '94 Boston Garden run. These are all excellent recordings of very strong shows.

P.S. Don't let the setlists or the reputation of latter-day Dead shows scare you away from the '94 Boston shows. All 6 were played with plenty of energy and inventiveness.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: doc drennan Date: Aug 27, 2006 12:11pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: best aud

hey thanks man i,m just surfing got plenty on my table but always love input. aint this site great

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: unclejohnnyd Date: Aug 27, 2006 2:08pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: best aud

" best" is too subjective. I SWEAR by 7-29-88, excellent sound. SOunds like a Matrix all the way. Of course 8-6-71 is one of the most celebrated. I think 10-1-76 aint too shabby either

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Purple Gel Date: Aug 27, 2006 2:38pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: best aud

Check out 9/11 & 12/81

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: stilldead77 Date: Aug 28, 2006 6:18am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: best aud

Well, I always like this thread and there has been a host of very useful ones since late last year. Here is a link you might also find useful: http://wtjusunshinedaydream.blogspot.com/2006/07/tasty-auds-on-archiveorg.html#best

Purple Gel will always go with the 9-11/12-81, and it's a classic. But, take a trip back a few months to 3-9-81 at MSG, Stranger comes in like a bolt and do check out Cap't Garcia at the beginning of China Cat with his awesome effects - China/Rider is hot.

By the way, 5-1-81 is "up there" in terms of energy, sound and Classic Dead in my opinion.

Enjoy!
Stilldead

This post was modified by stilldead77 on 2006-08-28 13:18:45

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Purple Gel Date: Aug 28, 2006 7:17am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: best aud

Here's another of my favorite run of auds
7/27, 28 & 29/82
Also Check out 7/14/81

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: unclejohnnyd Date: Aug 28, 2006 9:36am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: best aud

9-28-75 ALLWAYS been one of my favorites and this is one where the audience is far superior to the SBD imo. Same with 7-27-73 ( watkins glen soundcheck )

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: cosmicharlie Date: Aug 28, 2006 10:04am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: best aud

Too bad both archive listings for 9/28/75 say SB on them.
Apparently one of them IS an Aud, but it sounds too good so "They" listed it as a SB. What rubbish!!
here's the note from deadlists >>

"the FOB aud tape of this show is so good it is often called a sbd recording; the sbd recording surfaced as a "Honeymoon tape"

Now ARCHIVE personel, how 'bout changing that listing??? and giving back our Aud!
What, is 8/6/71 next because the taper did too good a job??? BS!!!

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Administrator, Curator, or StaffDiana Hamilton Date: Aug 28, 2006 10:51am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: SBD vs AUD labelling, 9/28/75

Apparently one of them IS an Aud

If you are referring to either of these items:
http://www.archive.org/details/gd75-09-28.sbd.fink.9392.sbeok.shnf
http://www.archive.org/details/gd75-09-28.sbd.bertha-ashley.22257.sbeok.shnf

As you can see, both were labelled as SBD upon upload. That information was used to make shows stream only or not here.

I don't see anything to contradict that SBD label on either one, here:
http://db.etree.org/shninfo_detail.php?shnid=9392
http://db.etree.org/shninfo_detail.php?shnid=22257

There are many other less-documented sources for that date in circulation. Perhaps an AUD is one of those others instead (not uploaded here):
http://db.etree.org/shnlist.php?year=1975&artist=2

Otherwise, if you can prepare coherent, accurate documentation for either source at archive.org demonstrating that it's actually an AUD (in contradiction to what the seeders said), go ahead and leave it as an error report on the relevant item at archive.org. Curators could evaluate your info and make a change as warranted. Thanks!

This post was modified by Diana Hamilton on 2006-08-28 17:51:40

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: cosmicharlie Date: Aug 28, 2006 10:47am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: SBD vs AUD labelling

you are welcome! and I'll try to make the case

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Administrator, Curator, or StaffDiana Hamilton Date: Aug 28, 2006 10:52am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: SBD vs AUD labelling

BTW if you are saying "apparently" just because there are 2 items for that date up here, you can't just make an assumption that they are 2 separate parent sources. Alternate masterings and such make it into circulation (and to the Archive) a lot.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: amosearle Date: Aug 29, 2006 10:21am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: SBD vs AUD labelling

Thanks, Diana, for your always constructive responses.
You moderation skills are appreciated.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: cosmicharlie Date: Aug 29, 2006 10:47am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: SBD vs AUD labelling

you certainly moderate me! And I appreciate it, cause I need it from time to time. And it turns out they ARE both SB's, so i stand corrected. I really should'nt post a complaint like i did, and I'm sorry

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: direwolf0701 Date: Aug 29, 2006 11:32am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: SBD vs AUD labelling

hey man - how bout joining our little deadhead, free fantasy football - should be fun - there are a few of us on the LMA who are playin'

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: cosmicharlie Date: Aug 29, 2006 11:43am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: SBD vs AUD labelling

Fantasies of....Football?? I have no clue what Fantasy Football is and I'm not much of a football fan either. Now boxing or MMA...we be talkin!
I'd bet you're a Colt's fan though...

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: direwolf0701 Date: Aug 29, 2006 12:14pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: SBD vs AUD labelling

was just hopin to get another person for our fun - and , no, colts suck - patriots fan here since i live about 10 miles from the stadium :) no problem man

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: cosmicharlie Date: Aug 29, 2006 12:17pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: SBD vs AUD labelling

well...i was following a linage from the 1947 Boston Yanks...
email me some info about Fantasy Football, izit an internet game?

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: direwolf0701 Date: Aug 29, 2006 12:26pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: SBD vs AUD labelling

sure - it is almost hands off except for trades and free agent pickups - you just set your roster and "play" against one of "us" from week to week for points. not very labor intensive - i'll email you the info in an hour or so. the yahoo.com computer runs all the scoring and stuff.